If only the unbiased posted here, the would be no thread.

All three "innocent" citizens were taken into custody in Syria. The charge is that Canada was involved by telling the Syrians what questions they needed answered while being interrogated, Syrian style.

Arar would never have been detained by the US without erroneous info from Canada. The US did send him to Jordan and then he was transported to Syria where he met the same fate as the other three.

I would like to know if The Canadians requested the US to send him to Jordan which seems possible to me.

I would also like to know why Canada did not ask that he be sent to Canada. That seems the most logical thing for them to do unless they wanted him sent to Jordan so he could be interrogated by the Syrians like the other three.

In any event these terrorism cases have many facets and swift judgments are not in the best interest of safety. Nothing is simple and clearcut in the Muslim world. There are a thousand of shades of gray between peaceful Muslims and radical Muslim extremists.

The thing that irks me is that to me it seems the majority of Muslims will allow the extremists to terrorize without even objecting to the bad name they give to the Muslim image as a whole. It is as if they are either afraid or they wouldn't mind if the whole world comes under Muslim dominance.

However if there was Muslim dominance, there would still be wars between the different sects of the religion like Shia and Sunni.