Hubby has been 'away' looking for that rare scientist who still has his head buried deep enough in the sand to doubt the mounting evidence. Yeah....the 90%+ 'could' be wrong, as that's how science works....but if 90+% of experts tell us that we have a serious problem, and if attacking that problem would bring other benefits, I'd say that's the way to bet!

What I don't understand is what, exactly, those who doubt that global warming exists, and that WE are contributing to it, think we should be doing....and what they think the problem would be with erring on the side of caution?
My guess is that some feel it would interfere with cherished economic and/or religious 'rights'.