LH: So if all 3 parties are committing terror, it all cancels out and terror is not a factor. Stick with me now. So the determining factor is who is trying to do what to whom.

White man wants Indian lands=bad. Indian doesn't want to give up lands=reasonable. So white man was wrong. I agree. Indian was there first.

Israeli wants his own country and wants to be left alone. When attacked, Israelis fight back fiercely. Good or bad?

Muslim claims Israeli's land is really his and constantly attacks Israeli. Good or bad? Note that Muslim has at least 100 times more land than Israeli and the Israeli was there first.

I do agree that the Israelis should vacate those settlements in Palestinian territory or there will never be a chance for peace. Those settlement are wrong.

I have no love for Jews but I have even less for Muslim extremist who will attack other neighboring countries when the Jews are taken care of. I haven't been threatened by any Jews. I haven't heard any Jews talk about drinking blood or burning people in their fury or anything like that.

The American Government wants peace in the midddle east.

Now Dianavan can turn her bullhorn up to full blast, ball up her fist in anger and attack me with her anti Semitic, anti US, pro Muslim rhetoric.