I attack ideas...not people. People who HAVE ideas I think are off-the-wall and who state those ideas as if they are revealed truth don't get a lot of respectful sharing of ideas from me, though.

I am willing to hear concrete evidence, but not 1 part vague & misleading data to 5 parts speculation.
As I have said, most of these conspiracy theories have precise, thought out, refutations by those in a position to sort rumor from wishful thinking.

You see the problem? If *I* am proven wrong, I will have to eat that egg on my face..(and I do NOT like eggs!)...but if no one proves all this "planned demolition" and "prior-to-the-time announcements" etc....then YOU can just keep claiming you are 'right' and that the proof has been hidden or someone is lying..etc. forever.

   Asking for more investigation is one thing...(even though there has to be a time to give up!)...but insisting that you have 'truth' and 'facts' based on subjective interpretation of spurious 'evidence' is quite another.
(I'm STILL shaking my head at those who claim that what hit the Pentagon was not a 757 airliner)