Unfortunately, the Supreme Court, in MO, as well as those of millions of others, blew it in 2000... But, hey, Bush was awarded the White House because, and I'm not aware of the constitutional basis for their decision, that Bush would have been "harmed" had the recount been continued...
As fir the nasty little habits... I present my arguments without having to misquote others... This is where we differ... I have no proble ms with you making your case but I, as well as others here, have called you repeatedly on making up stuff that you wished someone had said, then present it as if these things were actaully said...
That, my friend, would get you a stern lecture from any debating coach worth his or her salt... Not to mention it is dishonest...
Fell free to state your opinions and let me sate mine... I don't need to invent bb material any more than you need to invent Bobert material... And so I don't... But you do and everyone knows it... You are a smart 'nuff feller to not have to do that...
BTW, are you aware of how many times that DC law has been upheld???
BTW, part 2, as realted to the above question, are you not concerned about the "judical activism" in this case???
BTW, part 3, do you know the difference between making a "conclusion" and posting that someone esle said something that they didn't say???