http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/wtc_7_huge_amounts_of_smoke_came_from_wtc_5_6.htm

Just go there for a comparison of Bldgs 7, 5 & 6. 5&6 still standing...burned out hulks of steel girders. 7 barely damaged and brought down in a neat little pile. This is an incredibly well-presented article but it takes a minute to load.

Building 7 was perhaps the most solidly-built civilian building in the world. It was a steel building on top of a steel building, and in addition, it had just undergone an additional multi-million dollar upgrade to fortify its 20-floor observation deck which overlooked the rest of the complex. 7 housed the regional offices of all the major law enforcement and regulatory agencies. It was as indestructible as a civilian building could be.

Yet look at the pictures farther down in the article. Hardly any fires in 7 = total collapse. All-consuming fires in 6 & 5 = leftover steel frame.

That's what O'Donnell is talking about. Firemen and cops said the building was going to be "pulled" (industry term for "demolished"), the owner Silverstein said it too. So the building came down as the owner wanted. What's the big deal? Why does that make O'Donnell a conspiracy nut? Answer: because it goes against the official "myth" that was created and broadcast by the media beginning on 9/11. The media must demonize O'Donnell to keep you from looking at what she's SAYING.