The White House declassified and released Saturday the daily intelligence briefing delivered to President Bush a month before the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.

The declassified intelligence report said the FBI had detected "patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings."

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/10/bush.briefing/index.html

Sound familiar? After years of stonewalling, the Bush cabal was forced to release that memo. It was like a roadmap of what was about to happen.

Maybe we should all quit pretending to be experts in fields we're not and discuss something we all DO have some knowledge about--who did what when. We should be looking at things like Condoleeza Rice releasing that memo. Years of saying "we had no idea," then she casually produces the thing. And now people are discussing steel melting points, but we've just let Rice's admission that they were forewarned slide down the memory hole.

It's almost as if we're meant to focus on the unprovable technical aspects of the crime so we won't look at the provable human aspects.

What CAN be proven about 9/11 is that there is an ongoing government coverup regarding the event. It began with former prosecutor Guiliani (who as a prosecutor knew better), intentionally tainting a crime scene in order to get the WTC steel onto boats bound for China as fast as possible. The coverup continues today under the guise of gag orders and court-blocked legal proceedings.

So instead of speculating on HOW 9/11 was carried out, maybe we should be asking who's benefitting from 9/11? Who had motive, means and opportunity? Who demonstrated criminal intent before, during and after the crime? Who exhibited "criminal demeanor" before and after the crime, and during the coverup "investigations"? Looking at those points will tell you who the perpetrators were. The Cavemen of Tora Bora did not aim their flintlock muskets at the West and force Dick Cheney to make NORAD stand down.