Bobert:

"This thread is about poverty... Not you...

Sorry, but if that's all you have to ***add*** top this discussion then "Mr. Ignore" is all you'll get from me...

If you want to continue this personal discussion, do it thru PM's and save the others from your games thank you..."

Bobert:

You chose to ***add*** your personal accusations that I am smug and you said you knew I was white.

Now you refuse to elaborate on the grounds that it is not about me. This is another example of your stating things and refusing to substantiate them. You are under the impression that your "facts" do not have to be supported by you but they have to be accepted. They are absoulte and not debatable.                 

Oxford English Dictionary:
smug • adjective, irritatingly pleased with oneself; self-satisfied.

Now who is being smug?

I prefer to have a public debate about your public personal accusations about me which you seem to think supports the assertions you have made in this thread.

You are no doubt going to accuse me of trying to hijack this thread but I have noticed it is a ploy of yours to state things as a red herring andor an ad hominem attack and when someone trys to expose it as such, you avoid having to defend your accusations by accusing them of trying to hijack the thread. Another example of being smug and unable to debate logically.