The questioner laid out the series of events carefully then asked his question. Kerry answered that the building had to be brought down rather than repaired.

Problem is, the building was brought down in a perfect demolition on the afternoon of 9/11. It takes WEEKS to plant demolition charges in a building that size. The government has been saying the building fell, like WTC 1 and 2, as a result of damage. They've changed the story 5 times so far, too. But Kerry just admitted it was a demolition job, the day of the attacks. So, who planted the charges? You see the corner he painted himself into?