So Stilly, you haven't read the contributions by the eminent legal scholar Guest,Natural Guest?

And a judge has already ruled: Judge Barbara Bart rejected her request, ruling Hiasl didn't meet two key tests: He is neither mentally impaired nor in an emergency.

Couldn't "not mentally impaired" be presumed in this case to imply that the opinion was "relative to the abilities of an ordinary person?" - already implying acceptance by that court ... .

John