Bobert,

"has no problemn with inventing things that you wished the other person had said and then attacking that made up thing they sai"

Care to give an exanple??

As long as there is no further objection to me calling those I disagree with "Democraps" and terms of that ilk, you may use whatever label you wish- BUT be sure that *I* have actually made the comments that you want to attribute to me.


"How many times have you come here and called me a "liar""

Many times- WHENEVER I have found you making statements that were shown to be untrue, pointed out as untrue to you with the supporting sources, and YOU then repeated the falsehood. THAT is what a lie is.

I have repeatedly stated that I did not agree with the execution f the war in Iraq- I DID, and continue to, feel that the reasons for the attack, given what was known at the time, was correct.

There have been other occasions where I have stated by dislike of some particular policies: NOT because they were presented by Bush, as most here seem to rely on for what they support, but because *I* did not think that THOSE policies would be effective, or produce the desired result. But in the last election, the Democrats offered nothing other than "not-Bush" : When they bother to have a candidate who is running ON something, I will consider him/her.