I am realy glad to hear that you are not with the BNP, skipy, but you must understand how I was so confused over your politcal affiliations. These are all your own posts...

I have become active with a "smaller" party ????

BNP ?????

CORRECT
Skipy

BNP is not the party it used to be, check their web site, read what they have to say.

Acctually I don't think the BNP does support smoking I don't know for sure I haven't checked but there again have you?

You then moved on to

O/K "active" means I read their bloody website, about once a fortnight, if I remember to do so! Thats ALL!

and finaly

My connection with the BNP is that I have read their site as they are preparing to counter attack on the smoking law, no other connection at all! Most of what I have read is abstract lunacy.

All in the space of a week or two! I guess you are just using the BNP view to counterpoint those of the others but it is very difficult to spot what your views actualy are if you keep giving us conflicting information!

You have also changed considerably on another front!

Remember saying -

what is the point of that, so why go, so why run a charity, why bother to run a festival! The whole of my life may well change, I mmay leave folk music & charity behind me.

Well, you did.

What about

Tonight however I signed the cheques for the staff of the Old Mill Hall for the last time, end of an era - 11 years of attending a meeting every Monday, so who is going to do it from hereon in? well they will have to find a non smoker! There should be a meeting this Friday for the events of the weekend, non smoker needed or it will not be monitored for sound, health & safety etc.
Scout meeting next week, I won't be there, cub meeting the following week, well get someone else to repair the building, because I won't be there.

Yep, you said that as well.

You now say -

Also last night I agreed to carry on with my work...

What has caused these huge changes of viewpoint and attitude may I ask? For a man with an IQ of over 140 you seem to struggle a bit with logic and consistancy. May I suggest that rather than using inconsistant devices and false logic to back up your specious claims it would be better if you just admit that you are annoyed at the legislation for political and personal reasons? No-one will think any less of you.

I am more than happy to admit that I am arguing now just because I am enjoying it. I don't feel the need to justify myself. I also freely admit that some of your principles are spot on. I actualy bought a packet of cigars last week so I could smoke in a pub for one last time. People SHOULD have the right to smoke and drink. Pubs SHOULD have done something sensible for non-smokers rather than being forced to. Unfortunately they didn't and no amount of harping on about it will change history. Particularly when the harps are so badly tuned? :-)

Cheers

Dave