I don't know. If it were a murder victim, there would be a pathology/ coroner report, and the body would be buried. There is probably an analogy to how evidenciary material is treated here.

No, a human body has to be disposed of for obvious reasons. Non-flesh and blood evidence of a crime is supposed to be kept (and even some flesh and blood evidence is kept, for that matter). The debris from aviation disasters is kept for a long time so that disaster and aviation experts can examine it carefully to try to learn what caused the accident.

If there are lots of photographs and notes, the government could quite easily end all of the speculation about what really happened by releasing it to the public. Or at the very least, allowing independent researchers to examine it.


I'm told there was plenty of debris immediately after the impact.

Some people say this. But there are eyewitnesses who say otherwise. See my previous post.


I am noting that honest to god whistleblowers have legal rights which can be enforced and I've been witness to the fact.

Yes. Mr. Ryan has filed a lawsuit for wrongful termination. This is what he says in the website about it...


By all accounts, the unprecedented events of September 11th, 2001 "changed everything". It is therefore critical that conscientious Americans, as well as all good people around the world, understand these events in detail. Unfortunately the official reports, including The 9/11 Commission Report and the NIST WTC Report, written by those working under the direction of the Bush Administration, fall far short of providing the explanations needed.

Both the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and my former employer, Underwriters Laboratories (UL), seem to have taken the stance that the public does not have a right to know what fire resistance tests were performed on the steel component assemblies used to build the World Trade Center (WTC) towers. But since NIST's latest story for collapse of the WTC towers depends on the fire-induced failure of these steel components, there is little information that could be more important at this time.

When I worked there, top management at UL made clear to me that UL performed these required tests. They have since stated that there is "no evidence" that any firm tested the steel. Being tax-exempt, due to their status as a public safety-testing organization, UL should be held accountable for being honest and open with the public about the history of their testing.

To help ensure this accountability, I've filed a lawsuit against UL for wrongful termination. My attorneys and I hope to gain more information about UL's role in the testing of the WTC steel assemblies, and any other involvement UL has had with the WTC towers or the NIST investigation. Since this lawsuit represents a critical need for information about public safety, we invite the public to contribute to our legal defense fund.

Thanks for your help. Kevin Ryan

http://ultruth.com/