"These are, as often as not, people who work or worked in the government, intelligence services, military, air traffic control, aviation, disaster management, engineering and architecture, as well as first responders and other emergency personnel, and other professions that qualify them to be taken seriously, and not marginalized as kooks."

Implying that the other half ARE NOT to be taken seriously, and to be marginalized as kooks.

I am sure that the number is increasing- but that does NOT prove anything other than that the number is increasing.



"But whatever it was clearly didn't hit the building at the time of the initial blast. Something else created the initial damage to the building... not the jetliner. "

I still do not understand how you have determined that the core of the towers would not have collapsed without explosives, nor how the picture from the one frame of the Pentagon video that did show the plane is somehow not valid evidence that the plane hit. BTW, that film shows the building before the plane hits- and the building is undamaged.

If you would like to claim that there is a possibility that the government investigation is a coverup, feel free: BUT if you insist that it MUST be one, I will insist on evidence and sensible reasoning, before I will consider it.

You have rejected MY statement that aliens are responsible: Yet you offer no evidence whatsoever that I am incorrect. I have been in space operations for 29 years: By the standards you have shown in selection of your experts, I am far more qualified than you to make judgements on the possible involvement of aliens, and their motives.


Therefore, I will state that all the damage was originally caused by alien devices that utilized gravity implosions to bring down the towers and to damage the Pentagon. When you have any evidence at all that I am not correct, we can discuss YOUR theory about what happened.