So do you have any evidence that Bush is an alien, beardedbruce?

and other professions that qualify them to be taken seriously, and not marginalized as kooks." leads one to think that the OTHER half are NOT in those professions, and thus WOULD be qualified to NOT be taken seriously, and to be taken as kooks. Or why else did you state this?

It might lead you to think that, but it wouldn't lead me to think that. The reason I said that is because I know the tendency of people who are arguing on your side of the debate to immediately disqualify anyone who argues from my side of the debate as a kook. The professions that I have listed automatically lend credibility, but the professions of a lot of the others do not necessarily lend or negate credibility of the others. So I can only address the ones whose professions do lend credibility. That's why I didn't mention the others at all.