I have ceased posting because I doubt that ANY investigation would be believed by Carol C and various others unless it supported their theories. If an investigation came back and said, "we agree with the official report as published.." off we'd go again with MORE "but you're ignoring eyewitnesses and puffs of smoke and gravity and the melting point of steel and the types of wheels on 757s" (which has already been explained a dozen times).

I am no expert in demolition or building construction...what I DID study was "how to think and how to evaluate arguments", and I have tried to show, (as has BB in own inimitable way), that the form of the claims of the conspiracy mongers has serious problems. They flatly use specious debate techniques to support untenable hypotheses.

I have said, posted, explained, debated, listened, read about claims, compared reports and thought until I am dizzy....and every time I post answers to one claim, the debate is slipped sideways to another in a weird circle until I suddenly find the one I explained 3 days ago is back again as if I had said NOTHING.

I am NOT gonna convince anyone to back off and re-read the REAL evidence...so....propound away! Everyone needs a hobby.