"Entire floors were pulverized. "

If you read the article, you will see that the ONLY way the author could have the collapse occurr in the TIME OBSERVED was for ALL the floors to be pulverized BEFORE the top hit them.

This does NOT account for the volume of rubble, nor air resistance.

The explosions you claim were pulverizing the building ( as it stood for how many minutes ) were the transformers shorting out, and items burning. No need to postulate any explosives.

ONLY the increase in the pull of gravity could have caused the collapse in LESS than free fall time- Or will you now claim there were invisible rocket engines pushing the top stories down?

I have presented a postulate that explains the facts as observed, and that is supported by the arguement YOU have choosen to show that the report was wrong. YOUR failure to accept this as what really happened is proof of your complicity in a coverup of the real facts.


Right?