CarolC

Do you really think that ANY government is going to allow a report to be released without "damage control"? No matter who wins in 08, even if there is a new investigation, there will be

1. Points left unsaid, because they would embarass someone important.
2. Points covered up, because they would reveal existing weaknesses in our defences against further acts of terrorism.
3. Points covered up because it would be thought to be too cruel to the survivors- the possibly less than heroic acts of some of those who realized they had no way to survive, for example.
4. Points covered up because , with the best of intentions, not all people will agree on what any specific set of facts actually mean.


You have stated that you would accept my aliens IF I show you that Bush was one- this indicates you have somewhat less interest in the truth of what happened than in blaming the Bush administraion for it.

I do NOT "KNOW" what happened, in all details- but I will look at any reasonable research done- I will not accept claims that violate basic laws of physics, or require supernatural powers. I apply Occam's Razor to most problems- I will believe in a conspiracy when it becomes easier to explain what actually occurred that way.

Who do YOU think would be a neutral party to conduct these "independent, peer reviewed investigations into what happened on 9/11"? It seems to me that anyone who has already stated an opinion, such as most of those here,would bring far too great a predjudice against the truth alone being used for determination of who is to blame.