Isn't all of this being "peer reviewed" already?

Not really. Not as long as the government continues (with the help of so many people like many of those on this thread) to marginalize, ridicule, demonize, and suppress any investigations and investigators other than their own.

I go back to the one question that the "government conspiricists" cannot give a strong answer to - how?

Dr. Wood is right about one thing, at least, Ron. You don't have to prove the validity of any alternative scenario or theory in order to disprove an existing theory. So proving to you how it might have been done is not a prerequisite for disproving the government's version of how it was done. That's what independent investigations are for.