"So proving to you how it might have been done is not a prerequisite for disproving the government's version of how it was done."

Has her "proof" been subjected to peer review?   Her results of disproving the "official" version are not necessarily accurate.

When you say that some of us are trying to "marginalize, ridicule, demonize" - you forgot to inclue that we have also shown that some of these theories do not add up. You don't have to prove how it is done as a prerequiste for disproving the consipiracy version of how it was done.