Has her "proof" been subjected to peer review?   Her results of disproving the "official" version are not necessarily accurate.

Probably not yet, but I would like to see it happen, and I would like to be able to see whatever peer reviews are done on her work.

When you say that some of us are trying to "marginalize, ridicule, demonize" - you forgot to inclue that we have also shown that some of these theories do not add up. You don't have to prove how it is done as a prerequiste for disproving the consipiracy version of how it was done.

There's an awful big difference between pointing out inaccuracies and "marginalizing, ridiculing, and demonizing", Ron. I'm sure you can recognize which is which. So when I say that, I'm talking about the posts from people that contain "marginalizing, ridiculing, and demonizing" (read Captain Ginger's posts if you need a good example), and not posts that simply point out inaccuracies.