There are five frames from the camera, but only ONE shows the 757. The others show the explosion as SOMETHING hits the Pentagon. Of course, you may have seen altered pictures- as could I.

There are at least two that show the projectile. I saw the back end of the projectile. And I was watching the video from the Pentagon camera.


If you postulate a conspiracy, how can you trust ANY picture, video, .jpg, etc NOT to be altered? Where YOU there, with a camera? THAT might be acceptable as "proof" , provided that I were to trust that you had not altered it to show what YOU wanted me to believe happened.

Well, they could show us the footage from the security cameras from the hotel across the road. But you're right. That, alone, wouldn't prove anything. The best way to arrive at something that resembles the truth is to put science to work to prove which of the different hypotheses are possible and which are not.

For instance, the time anomalies. Nobody has offered any possible reasons for those anomalies. They just ignore their existence. The hard data shows us that the blast occurred three or four minutes at least before any sort of plane even showed up (which, according to hard data, was the exploratory plane piloted by the same pilot who said he couldn't see any sign of a plane crash). This warrants further study, from people who are not accountable to the Bush administration.