Personal attacks of a scatological nature, eh, there Sweetie?

And, of course, the accusation made by all advocates of conspiracy theories against anyone who disagrees with them (especially when presented with a cogent refutation of the rococo "evidence" used to support the theory) that, if you don't agree, then you must be part of the conspiracy.

Conspiracy theory advocates usually start that when someone is really getting up their nose by yanking the rug out from under their sales pitch. You're getting desperate, Sweetie Patootie!

I am in wholehearted agreement that there should be an independent investigation (maybe several) into the 9/11 attacks and what led up to them, and that the guilty and/or criminally negligent (and there is plenty of evidence that the Bush administration was, at the very least, criminally negligent) should be brought to book.

But this hysterical exercise you're trying to peddle is only fogging up the whole issue.

Don Firth