Where there's smoke, there may well be more than tobacco (to be topical).

The Office of Public Prosecutions studied the evidence for three (3!) months before deciding not to prosecute. That tells me that the evidence was important enough to merit all this study. Indeed, there must have been some incriminating evidence, otherwise the file would not have been sublitted to the OPP in the first place.

For me, the only unanswered question is: Was the evidence truly insufficient to merit prosecution, or did the coverup extend to the OPP? I like to believe the former, in my naivete.

What next in Blair's legacy - Cash for Peace in the Middle East?