Big difference, John. Darwinism, in general, is accepted as the model which aligns and clarifies all known data to date, with the least complex or arbitrary explanation. If new data were found which controverted it--or part of it -- it would be carefully incorporated into a modified model IF it were confirmed data. Hell, even Piltdown Man got incorporated and it was bum data! Creationism, basically, has one data source and accepts no other.

A