Probably Jed, because the words have no meaning anymore except to make some political point as is the wont of our system. Within that system, we have established methodology for this particular means of government and it no longer makes a difference, except to somehow position oneself for acceptability by others.

We can talk and have opinions on a variety of issues and not follow what would be the "logical" assumptive order since each of us has had our experiences colored by the times and circumstances in which we have lived. I am always more troubled by the talk from everyone about freedoms as though they are the sole province of consevatives or liberals, Republicans or Democrats. The fact that we have continually given up freedom to governments or companies is proof that though we may talk a good line, "I'll shave my head for good health care." That is to say, what are we willing to give up to improve the quality of our individual lives? And are we all willing to play? Someone mentioned the "anarchy no-no." My gawd how awful that would be. Why someone could come along and take your stuff just because you didn't want to do it their way and wanted your way instead. 'Course that's pretty much what the IRS does now. Gee........

Responsibility is the key word that must accompany freedom and people of both sides and the middle of the political spectrum are loathe attach it. Without it "freedoms" are simply words without meaning. And frankly, I would submit that true freedom scares the hell out of us. But we love to think about it in personal terms. Once again I quote this.....by Jacques Ellul:

"The people will fancy an appearance of freedom. Illusion will be their native land."

Spaw