The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #104322   Message #2142727
Posted By: John Hardly
06-Sep-07 - 04:45 PM
Thread Name: BS: Senator Larry Craig (R-Idaho)- lewd conduct
Subject: RE: BS: Senator Larry Craig (R-Idaho)- lewd conduct
"...and I never heard one say he DID apporve")

up thread:

From: Riginslinger - PM
Date: 03 Sep 07 - 01:47 PM

There wasn't anything vile about what Clinton did.


"It certainly didn't warrant $80 million and months of attention...

And as you know, it didn't get it either. It came at the tail end (so to speak) of a very long and drawn out investigation into several scandals, some of which ended up in jail time for a few. I don't know how much of the $70Mil (TIA) or $80Mil (you) was specific to the Paula Jones case. Do you?


"It is all pretty simple...Craig is not Barney Frank, and he is from a conservative state and in a conservative party who find his overall behavior in the matter a blot on the party and a BIG distraction. He has NO chance of re-election, and would be shunned by his Republican colleagues if he did not resign. (I believe that no Senator has been FORCED out in about 100 years!...and they don't want to have to.)"

^ From this point on you must no longer be addressing me, as I made the same points.

"It's funny...he be a better help to the Democrats if he DID refuse to resign!"

That ship has sailed. The Democrats are already "helped". Either and any way.