The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #105695 Message #2178644
Posted By: GUEST,a shadow of my former elf
25-Oct-07 - 01:26 AM
Thread Name: BS: Our new Constitution and new Pentagon
Subject: RE: BS: Our new Constitution and new Pentagon
So what are you saying Joe Offer, that I see the access denied screen because I use assorted names? I think a more likely reason is that you just have some pissy moderators who thought they were "liberals" all their lives but are now starting to realize they are fascists. Welfare-state fascists. Their Chosen One Hitlary says Americans should be FORCED to purchase health insurance, and the Iraq war should go on forever, and there won't be any tax increases for the super rich. Must be hard to be a Democrat nowadays.
Let's see...before the door's slammed on me again, the Fulford thing. Somehow I get the feeling the guy is perpetrating a hoax. Things are so utterly bad in America, it seems as if nothing short of a miracle can save the country. And up pops this miracle. A mysterious Oriental society. And if the wicked Illuminati doesn't go along with the society's wishes, it'll kill, probably with technology that causes strokes. And they'll start at the top with David Rockefeller. But Rockefeller is 96 frickin years old, so if he has a stroke tomorrow, what does that mean? Is it just nature taking its course, or have we been saved by the Yakuza? Man. What a perfect cover story. The only thing that would make me believe the story is is video of Cheney getting disassembled with samurai swords.
So, should I just stick to the "Hitlary '08" handle, Joe? I've worked up a nice bumper sticker design with the slogan and sent it to the Clinton campaign...waiting to hear back. I think it would appeal to the far right-wing crowd, pull people together under the big tent and all that. Let me know on the handle thing.
If you're here to do battle, you're not welcome here. If you're here for a civil, intelligent discussion, that's another thing. The rules here require posters to refrain from combative conduct and to use a consistent identity - and yes, it would be better if the name you choose were non-provocative ("shadow of my former elf" is rather nice). That's the terms of your participation here. I'd say the tone of your messages in this thread is not in compliance with those terms. You're free to express whatever opinion you have - but in a non-combative manner, and using only one name. You've used far more than one. Thank you. -Joe Offer, Forum Moderator-