I am reasonably certain that most of you have seen this. I know you understand it or you would
not be in my address book. If you think Man #10 got what he deserved---the beating---please let
me know so I can do further adjustment. I DO NOT begrudge #10 his $10, but a lot of people do
not look at it this way. When I was trying to run a band, I had to deal with this. I had two guys,
each of whom played a half a show and one, at least expected the same amount as those who
played the entire show. Isn't that what Karl Marx decided should be the case?

I DO like the last statement!!
For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not
> understand, no explanation is possible.
>

Bar Stool Economics



















Subject: Fw: Bar Stool Economics

A different way of looking at it.............
----- >
>
> Perhaps this will stimulate some reflection among the thinking persons who currently call themselves liberals.
>
>
> Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten
> comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it
> would go something like this:
>
> The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
> The fifth would pay $1.
> The sixth would pay $3.
> The seventh would pay $7.
> The eighth would pay $12.
> The ninth would pay $18.
> The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.
>
> So, that's what they decided to do.
>
> The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the
> arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve. 'Since you are
> all such good customers,' he said, 'I'm going to reduce the cost of your
> daily beer by $20.' Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.
>
> The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the
> first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free.
> But what about the other six men - the paying customers? How could they
> divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair share?'
> They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted
> that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would
> each end up being paid to drink his beer. So, the bar owner suggested
> that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same
> amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.
>
> And so:
> The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).
> The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).
> The seventh now pay $5 instead of $7 (28%savings).
> The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
> The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
> The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).
>
> Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued
> to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to
> compare their savings.
>
> 'I only got a dollar out of the $20,'declared the sixth man. He pointed
> to the tenth man,' but he got $10!' 'Yeah, that's right,'
> exclaimed the fifth man. 'I only saved a dollar, too. It's unfair that
> he got ten times more than I!' 'That's true!!' shouted the seventh man.
> 'Why should he get $10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the
> breaks!' 'Wait a minute,' yelled the first four men in unison. 'We
> didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!'
>
> The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.
>
> The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat
> down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill,
> they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money
> between all of them for even half of the bill!
>
> And that, ladies and gentlemen, journalists and college professors, is
> how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the
> most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for
> being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they
> might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat
> friendlier.
>
> David R. Kamerschen, Ph.D.
> Professor of Economics
> University of Georgia
>
> For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not
> understand, no explanation is possible.

chuck hemrick