Why is intervening in the case of the rape victim interference in the internal affairs of another country, yet the Sudanese case not - the teacher in question was a resident of Sudan and therefore subject to their laws (whatever we might think of them).
Since the end of WW1 the US has bombed, invaded or otherwise directly interfered in the internal affairs of over 50 countries (not to mention   the clandestine activities) all with British support. Is this not interfering in the internal affairs of other countries (or doesn't Viet Nam, Grenada, Chile, Korea, The Gulf, Iraq, The Philippines - et al, count).
Jim Carroll