Well, first of all, T... Here is where you're not seeing clearly...

You still are playing the prove-you-don't-have-something game... That is, in essence, Blix's critisim of the Iragis...

But this, given the short time (some two months) that the inspectors were back in Iraq coup0led with the fact taht it had been close to 10 years since the last inspections, was ***not*** grounds to invade... Blix repeatedly reported cooperation from the Iraqis in giving the inspectors freedom to inspect where ever they wanted... Blix also spoke with some amazement on just how many well the team was organizized...

So this invasion was grossly premature!!! Millions of people took to the street aropund the world because of the complete insanity of what we all knew and that was the Bush wasn't going to let the inpector ecceeed... That is why he pulled the plug...

The decision to invade Iraq was made long before 9/11... There is sufficient testimoney to that for this not even to be debateable...

Bush wanted his war and he wasn't going to let not psky UN or inspectors ruin it for him... Period... End of story...

Now, to wit: Saddam killed 603 Kuwaitis!!! Okay, so he did... Bush has killed upwards of a million people!!!

As for me I'd rather see Saddam still in power... By now he would be back in the fold having done his repentence, Donnie Rumsfelf woulf still be the Secretary of Defense and over there showering Saddam with gifts and Saddam and Bush would be back to exchanging Christman cards...

Lost in all various defenses of the Bushites is that Saddam was a company lap dog for the US until Kuwait... Saddam was such a Bush I inasider that he thought he had gotten a "wink" from the Bush I folks on taking Kuwait or I don't think he would have pulled off such a bonehead stunt...

But nevermind that... Bottom line is that Saddam coyuld have been broughjt back around... The US plays and/or contains bad dictators quite well when it is so motivated and had the inspectors finished their work Saddam would now be every much contained and repentent...

My opinion about assasinating him is why you, T, and your buddy Bush, thought that taking out upwards of a million Iraqis, plunging the US economy into ruin and killing the US reputation around the world was better than assasinating him and maybe even his sons???

That is the big queation for you...

As for killing innocent Iraqi civilians, you and Bush are in cahoots on the killing of upwards of a million Iraqis, most of whom were civilians... This was the dumbest question of your three...

As for your bud, bb, T??? He is beyond hope... Ahhh, not that you aren't... He won't answer any questions anymore with anything but thwe sme tired, worn out bumper sticker crap... His mind is so closed that you couldn't get a feeler guage between it and the propaganda...

Any more questions, T-zer??? Keep 'um in threes like in your last post and we can do this until they burty one of us in 30 or so years...

I know exactly why you have chosen this time to refight your previuosly lost batteles... It's that thirst for more blood... More Sock 'n Awe...

Whay don't you just take up video games where real moms and kids don't get killed???

B~