Well, well, well...

Seems that both bb and T have them a nice little circle jerk between themselves while I was out, ahhhhh, actaully working for a living...

But nevermind that...

Seems they also are suffering from bad cases of "Gotcha, Bobert"... Problem is that they invent stuff they wished I'd said and then they attack what they wished I'd said...

BB, fir instant, says in his 17Dec07 12.01pm post that I "claimed that Dr. Hans Blix stated that the Iarqis were cooperating fully with UNMOVIC"...

Problem here is that I never made that statement the way that bb put it in his post...

Lie #1 for bb...

And then T'Bird jumps on bb's "FULLY" (sorry folks for the sceaming but I'm just typing it the way the SCREAMERs typed it) so now we have that game where one lie gets passed on and then the other half of the tag team, rather than verify that is exactly what I had said, assumes that his bud is telling the truth and so he just makes up his new argument based on defensing Lie #1...

Hmmmmmmmm???

But nevermind that stuff... These folks, especially bb, love to throw out the "lie" word, something that is quite distastefull in any civilized discussion where folks have differnt world views, so I won't continue doen the "L"-path...

But let's get to the meat and taters here... It about when Bush knew that Iran had discontinued it's nuclear weapons program....

I have been accused of fabricating (lieing) about what has been reported about whn Bush knew and if Bush knew before his Oct. 13th "WW III" speech or his Oct. 23 "Iran is pursuing" speech...

So, from Peter Baker and Robin Wright's Dec. 4, 2007 article in the Washington Post entitled "A Blow to Bush's Tehran Policy, and I quote:

"President Bush got the world's attention this fall when he warned that a nuclear-armed Iran might lead to World War III. But his stark warning came at least a month or two after he had first been told about fresh indications that Iran had actually halted it nuclear weapons program."

Now if you two, bb and T, want to get into calling folks liars (or telling lies) why not start with the Washington Post writers...

Do wither of you have any evidence that these writers lied??? If so, then have at them... I'm sure you would be heros to every Bushite in the land... I mean, folks would put up statues of both of you for exposing that the Washington Post lied... Hey, don't with of you know that Bush has folks that read the Washington Post lloking for innacuracies in reporting??? Why didn't Bush people jump on this one???

Well, don't hurt your heads on this one... It's becasue in spite of the fact that neither of you knotheads wished it weren't rue, apparently it is true...

Yeah, you can SCREAM whatever you want... You can misquote me and then argue with the misquotes but...

... you two are shamefull in not keeping up with the real story... I don't know if it's some right winged Bush-blog that has taken over your critical thinking but something sho nuff has...

You know, I don't mind debating ideas... I really don't mind debating the facts on the ground... But arguing aginst your mythology is getting rather tiresome...

Try to keep up with the facts, pleeeeeeze... Is that too much to ask???

B~