Again Bobert, I am not defending anything. Just pointing out that fact that you claim accuracy that does not exist and use generalizations to arrive at facts that are not correct.

Your biased, objective reasoning is incorrect. When challenged you display your bias by claiming I am defending or supporting something or someone. That I am biased. I am defending free speech and logic. Got something against that? Or you are for free speech and logic only when it agrees with you and get huffy and puffy when it does not?

"The failure to distinguish between things which are actually different is the keynote of insanity."

What is the term for not being able to tell when things are the same but you choose to react in opposite ways about each? Is it called sanity or Bias?

"We can deliberately kill in the womb but convicted murderers do not deserve to die and no one should ever die in a war." Is that a sane statement? If it is sane, just say so. Back it up by stating it.

Just because the comparison of death by abortion to capital punishment death during armed conflict makes you uncomfortable does not mean I can't make the comparison here. It is still as free country right?