Six answers, Bobert:

1. Why are you back to SCREAMING???

Because you seem incapable of reading and understanding simple English statements, and I find that to be annoying.

2. Do you think that SCREAMING makes your points any more correct???

No. Nor do I believe, as you seem to, that it makes them any LESS correct.

3. Why didn't you answer my question???

I did:
"Subject: RE: BS: WMDs, Iran and Bush
From: beardedbruce - PM
Date: 03 Jan 08 - 12:49 PM

Bobert,

In a previous thread, talking about the ABM system near Russia,
I stated that the US should share the control of that site JOINTLY with the Russians, so that they would not feel threatened by it.

What was YOUR suggestion? That the US NOT try to protect those nations that we have a treaty obligation to protect?

I think on this topic, at least, I have shown less desire to wipe out tens of millions of people than YOU have. "

4. Why can't you respond with one post rather than 3 or 4 or 5???

Because THEN you complain that my post are too long for you to bother reading.

5. Again, can you show us one single post where you have advocated diplomacy over militarism???

See the answer to #3

6. How's you militaristic foreign policy' workin' for ya???

Since I am not the one saying we should have no option other than to destroy entire nations if a single madman attacks us, it would seem that YOU need to answer it, not me.

Since I have a pacific policy ( ie, I DON'T want to kill innocent civilians and burn babies, as you obviously do) the question is meanlingless.