"Bruce, Hillary isn't already in office and this is a primary, not an election."

So the level of fraud that is "definite proof" in convicting Bush is not applicable???



LH,

MY comment was that there is a double standard here, in that Clinton gets away with numbers that were "definite proof" that Bush had stolen the election. It is the double standard that I am pointing to, not the actual fraud- I DO NOT KNOW if the models used are accurate or not in these predictions, only that those here who criticise Bush are strangely silent when a Democrat does the same thing.