Of all of the threads at Mudcat, odd that this one should attract so many outsiders. Or Mudcatters with odd guest noms-de-plume, but I don't think so.

Sorry if Mudcat isn't good enough for Wikipedia (isn't that a hoot!) but Mudcat was around first, and it's doing its own thing. And if you do a search at Mudcat on "Wikipedia," you'll find a helluva lot of folks on many threads telling reminding others that Wikipedia isn't a source to be relied upon, it's just a starting point. Too many cooks stirring that pot.

SRS