So if Nader said that with him in the game and the Democrats can't win then they probably deserve to lose? Let me ask you this-When he sits back at home after the 2008 election, which side will he have less regret for winning-Democrats, or Republicans? Yes I know full well that he sees little difference between the two nowadays, which is why he is running. But which party will come closer to at least discussing the things on his agenda? Which party will attempt to get us out of this debacle in Iraq in a logical approach, which party will attempt to address this supposedly rosy economy that we have, which is not so rosy? Which party will attempt to get the U.S. back in good standing with the world again? I will say this so I will not be accused of ignoring it: Yes, the Democrats need a good kick in the pants, (so do the Republicans for that matter) in an effort to have some party unity. But as an American citizen, will Nader feel a more appropriate direction is happening with Obama/Clinton, or McCain?