Well, the media would like to have a brawl, instead of just a floor fight, which wasn't all that uncommon in the 20th century, but thanks to brainwashing of the electorate, people seem to now view as an impossibility because it isn't 'nice' to criticize one's opponent.

The process the Obamamaniacs keep whining about is a process set up by the party. Don't like it? Well then, make a few billion and buy some change--the way it REALLY gets done. Obama has more than enough chump change to buy his way in. What he won't have when he gets to Denver is enough delegates. And neither will Clinton.

So let's say it is a stalemate when they reach Denver. Obama wins everything except PA, and enough delegates to put him over the top.

Clinton wins all the big states, is within 100-200 delegates of Obama, and doesn't have enough delegates to put her over the top.

Who should get the nod then?

What is everyone proposing to broker this deal, because it is NOT going to come down to the number of states won, or the popular vote this year.

So instead of being a bunch of prissy whiners--what is your solution to the Dem conundrum people?

Give it to Obama, because he is nicer than Clinton (you say) and makes people in red states the Dems won't win in November feel good?