1) Folk isn't a dirty word but 1954 definitions do not close debate, neither in any arts or science. Only the wilfully perverse build those walls.
2) No strong feelings either way unless a paying public are invited, then 'folk' has to take its place on the popular cultural duck shoot.
3)There should be a place for people develop without ridicule. That does not mean lack of development is a worthy characteristic in music or human nature. There's a fine line between retarding a cultural tradition and preserving it. I won't take lectures from anyone proffessing certainty either way.
4)Alienation? Or just choice in an eclectic musiverse?
5)Drinking from a tankard, wearing a smock and the use of panchromatic trousers are for those untroubled by the problems of aesthetics. None are hanging offences.