Well thank God, well, no, that's not right. Thank Jack the Sailor that Jack the Sailor is the standard by which the sanity of all others, and especially anyone having an opposing point of view, is judged. At least we now know right from wrong.

I used to think that the radical Islamists hated Israel. I guess I have just been misunderstanding all I have read or heard. It was probably Zionist lies and propaganda from the Zionist presses of the world. How could anyone get the mistaken idea that Achmaddidajob was really anti-Israel? I know the man loves rocketry as a hobby and he is just developing the long range sort so he can share his hobby with his neighbors. And the greenies assures us everyday that the world is about out of oil so gee, I guess I would want to develop nuclear stuff too, just in case.

In the game of thermonuclear warfare, them what gets there firstest with the mostest wins. The other guy might be armed to the teeth but if he can't reach the button, so what? In the case of the US and the old USSR or even China such vast distances and areas are involved that no one could begin to imagine that a first strike would take out all ability to respond. Hence MAD was a tension-filled standoff. Israel is a country of around 5 million souls in an area smaller than any of the first three largest COUNTIES of California. Talk about fish in a barrel! Hillary's statement was CONDITIONAL, that is IF Iran did something so foolish as to try to take out Israel. Hers is a proper response to a VALID threat and one that ANY of our allies would like to hear from us.

The difference between a threat and a valid threat is the means and the ability to carry out that threat. Iran has the means, those long range rockets. If, IF she develops nuclear weapons look out. The threat itself shows intent. Rodney King asked the right question "Why can't we all just get along?" Unfortunately, not everybody WANTS to get along.