Katlaughing, I got the impression that you were reading the article in "Islam Review" as an analysis from the Islamic side. If so, it isn't. Your 2nd and 3rd links are both highly biased arguments from a very fundamentalist Christian stance, with some very forced logic and exegisis to get to the conclusions they are set on reaching. Perhaps the only point they make that is actually logical (preceeding from some suppositions firmly rooted in the Christian tradition which may or may not be literally true) is that, if Jesus is an essential part of the makeup of God, and is the only human of whom that is true, then both Jews and Moslems have a concept of God so basically flawed that it amounts to mistaking who "He" is.