"In the name of fighting the 9-11 terrorists, the Bush administration overthrew the one Arab government most adamantly opposed to the Saudi financiers of that son of their system, Osama bin Laden. Instead of confronting the royal leaders of a kingdom that supplied 15 of the 19 hijackers, we invaded a nation that supplied not a single one. While Bush overthrew Saddam Hussein, who had no ties to the hijackers, he embraced the leaders of Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, the only three nations in the world that had diplomatically recognized and supported the Taliban sponsors of al-Qaida." Robert Scheer

And McCain agrees with and supports a war begun with that rationale and in such circumstances? I've coined a truism: There is one way that elderly John McCain is younger than the dubya. He is a 'son of a Bush.'