From www.braunsteinspeaks.com
Although I do not agree with what he has to say, you do have to admire his colorful witticisms and the way in which he expresses himself. He is the Rush Limbaugh of the blogosphere.

                                                 SOL


The 'Pussy' Party

I think that it is best for all the children, the infirm, and the limp-wristed to leave the room. This one is going to be rough. This column is definitely not for the faint of heart.

Despite the title, this is not an essay about young cats; neither is it an essay about promiscuous sex. It is an essay that explores where the Democratic Party stands today—and where we all stand as Americans—in a world fraught with new dangers that many of us either can't see—or pretend don't exist.

Ralph Waldo Emerson said, "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds."

Mr. Emerson's point was that intelligent people consider each new challenge for what it is, and not reach for the old solutions. The military refers to this tendency as, "Generals are always prepared to fight the last war."

Today's name for this society-killing disease is "political correctness," and we are positively awash in it. Political correctness is the cowards' excuse to do nothing that might rock the boat.

All politicians are cowards. It seems to be a condition of the breed, no matter which party they represent.

The Democratic Party, however, has absolutely lost its will to represent the American People. They have adopted a philosophy of lying to the voters, lest the voters find out the Democrats' true mission.

Bill Clinton was especially skilful when it came to lying to the American People, and thus was able to serve two full terms as president, a feat not accomplished by a Democrat since Franklin Roosevelt served three full terms, and was elected to a fourth, before he died in 1945.

The two surviving Democratic ex-presidents—Clinton and the idiot Carter—are both embarrassments to this nation.

Being called a "pussy" is not a statement implying gender; it is a statement implying weakness. Jimmy Carter, who was thought to be a man, was a weakling; while Margaret Thatcher, Golda Meir, and Indira Gandhi—all women—were all strong leaders of their respective nations.

A strong leader doesn't attempt to lie his way out of trouble—as Bill Clinton does—or cry her way out of trouble, wearing a pretty pink frock—as Hillary Clinton still does.

Today, the Democratic Party gives us Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, each bitch-slapping the other over their petty differences about how weak each can be in the office of President of the United States.

Which one can pull out of Iraq faster? Which one promises more "free" health care that someone else will have to pay for? Which one can best buy votes, and thus, spend us into oblivion more quickly?

In their quest for the uneducated white vote in Indiana and North Carolina, which one of the two loves guns more? Which one would more gladly die on the cross of the Second Amendment?

Which of these two moral cowards is more like an evil Republican? Which one secretly admires Ronald Reagan?

If any Democratic candidate for office actually stated what he—or she—really believed, not only would that candidate never be elected, but he would probably be lynched!

It really doesn't matter which of these two Democratic candidates gets the nomination. What matters is what happens in November.

Vote as if your very future depends on it—because it does.