Since both these candidates seem to have thee same position in this context, why should the organisation have felt it appropriate to come out with an endorsement in any case?
.............................

I understood from GUEST,Fantasma's previous posts that both Clinton and Obama should be seen as equally crap candidates with nothing to chooise between them, and that Fantasma's only reason for directing the attacks at the latter was because there are more Obama sympathisers on the Cat than Clinton sympathisers.

That doesn't seem to tie in with the post opening this thread which indicates a definite preference for Clinton. (Or are there two GUEST,Fantasmas ?)