The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #111193   Message #2343532
Posted By: GUEST,Fantasma
18-May-08 - 09:00 AM
Thread Name: BS: Superdelegates - What's the point?
Subject: RE: BS: Superdelegates - What's the point?
It might help if people here knew (much less were capable of remembering) that Hubert Humphrey "won" the Democratic party nomination in 1968 without running in one single primary election. Not one.

Back then, it wasn't about "electing" the nominee. It was all about "selecting" the nominee.

From Wikipedia:

"The selection of a Presidential nominee was particularly difficult for the Democrats that year because of the split in the party over the Vietnam War, President Lyndon B. Johnson's decision not to seek re-election (announced March 31), and Robert Kennedy's assassination (June 6). On one side, Eugene McCarthy, ran a decidedly anti-war campaign, calling for immediate withdrawal from the region. On the other side, Vice President Hubert Humphrey, from Minnesota, who did not participate in any primaries but controlled enough delegates to secure the nomination, called for a policy more in line with President Johnson's, which focused on making any reduction of force contingent on concessions extracted in the Paris Peace Talks.

The Democrats eventually nominated Humphrey, who went on to lose the election to Richard M. Nixon. The confusion of the convention, and the unhappiness of many liberals with the outcome, led the Democrats to begin reforms of their nominating process, increasing the role of primaries and decreasing the power of party delegates in the selection process."