Rig--


And what the WSJ says has exactly zero influence on Obama's troubles with white working-class voters--that's yet another of your classic smears--or non sequiturs. Sometimes it seems you are capable of nothing else.

But those troubles can--and will--be addressed by direct contrast of Bush (and now McCain) on issues which concern those voters.

Specifically health care, loss of jobs, and the war in Iraq.

It was never likely that Obama would get large numbers of voters in WV or in the PA mountains, for instance.

But anybody capable of thinking should realize that Hillary was not about to get them either in the fall--against McCain--are you kidding? Her supporters--like your good self?-- were living in a fool's paradise to assume that anybody who voted for her against Obama would support her against an authentic American hero with more military experience than any presidential nominee for decades.

But Obama has great sources for votes elsewhere. And Hillary, as I've said over and over, thanks to her position as the most polarizing candidate and her stupidly poisoning the well she intended to drink from, had no chance against McCain.