He is by far not the only way in quest of a Unified TOE (Theory of Everything).

LH, no-one is asserting EInstein is the "final" anything. It would be anti-scientific. WHat I said was that the issues he raises are still being worked through.

One of the kedge anchors on this whole process is that we are not very good, in the West, at erecting conceptual frameworks that break away from the habit-patterns of perception defined by the body's effort-band perceptions. We're used to Newtonian spacetime, because that is how our bodies perceive and survive, and it becomes a very hard habit to break. I think this is what makes relatavistic frames of reference, and quantum phenomena, so hard for most folks to wrap their wits around (including me).


A