Neither. I am pointing out that the criticised policy of the Bush administration is the welcome "change" of the presumptive Democratic candidate.

So, why was Bush wrong and Obama right, saying the SAME thing????

It is reasoning like this that allows the Democrats to achieve defeat even when they have the advantage. They would get far more positive credit for just admitting that Bush was not entirely "evil", or that their candidate at least got his feet wet when he walked on water.