Reports elsewhere on the single case cited indicate that the one person "cured" was the only one of several receiving the same procedure who showed a benefit from it. It is thus still necessary to find why it helped him and did not help any of the others.

It was noted in one article that he had received prior "conventional" treatment, via radiation(?) and/or chemotherapy(?); and one commenter/reviewer suggested that the prior treatment might have been a necessary condition to make the cancer susceptible to the antibody augmentation.

A "complicating factor" cited in one report was that not all of those who participated in the test remained "accessible" for follow-up, with some at least simply withdrawn by personal request, i.e. declining further participation.

Much work to be done.

John