In the absence of any information on the ethos of the Democratic party...except for Bobert who doesn't count as he's a pesky Green...I've been rootin' around on my own. Found a couple of nice articles by John Pilger which explain quite a bit about "Democratic" thinking. "In 1941, the editor Edward Dowling wrote: "The two greatest obstacles to democracy in the United States are, first, the widespread delusion among the poor that we have a democracy, and second, the chronic terror among the rich, lest we get it." What has changed? The terror of the rich is greater than ever, and the poor have passed on their delusion to those who believe that when George W Bush finally steps down next January, his numerous threats to the rest of humanity will diminish." John also delves back into Democrat history, describing the tradition of war-making and expansionism that Obama has left little doubt he will honour. He lists pronouncments from Obama. Supporting an "undivided Jerusalem" as the Israeli capital...Telling Cuban exiles that he will continue the illegal blockade...Making threatening statements to Leftist South American regimes, describing them as a "vacuum to be filled"
John concludes with the following indictment. "It is time the wishful-thinkers grew up politically and debated the world of great power as it is, not as they hope it will be. Like all serious presidential candidates, past and present, Obama is a hawk and an expansionist. He comes from an unbroken Democratic tradition, as the war-making of presidents Truman, Kennedy, Johnson, Carter and Clinton demonstrates. Obama's difference may be that he feels an even greater need to show how tough he is. However much the colour of his skin draws out both racists and supporters, it is otherwise irrelevant to the great power game. The "truly exciting and historic moment in US history" will only occur when the game itself is challenged."